A 2007 study showed that NAFTA had « a considerable influence on the volume of international trade, but a modest effect on prices and prosperity. »  From the beginning, nafta`s critics feared that the agreement would lead to the relocation of U.S. jobs to Mexico, despite the complementary naalc. For example, NAFTA has affected thousands of American autoworkers in this way. Many companies have relocated production to Mexico and other countries where labor costs are lower. However, NAFTA may not have been the source of these measures. President Donald Trump`s USMCA should dispel these concerns. The White House estimates that the USMCA will create 600,000 jobs and add $235 billion to the economy. According to a 2018 Sierra Club report, Canada`s commitments collided under NAFTA and the Paris Agreement. The Paris commitments were voluntary and the NAFTA commitments were mandatory.
 If the original Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) had entered into force, existing agreements, such as NAFTA, would be reduced to those that would not be contrary to the TPP or that would require greater trade liberalization than the TPP.  However, only Canada and Mexico would have the prospect of becoming members of the TPP after U.S. President Donald Trump withdrew the United States from the agreement in January 2017. In May 2017, the remaining 11 members of the TPP, including Canada and Mexico, agreed to continue with a revised version of the trade agreement without U.S. participation.  A Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement The free trade agreement was concluded in 1988 and NAFTA extended most of the provisions of this agreement to Mexico. NAFTA was created by U.S. governments. George H.W. Bush, Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney and the Mexican President. Carlos Salinas de Gortari.
A provisional agreement on the Pact was concluded in August 1992, signed on 17 December by the three Heads of State and Government. NAFTA was ratified by the national legislators of the three countries in 1993 and entered into force on January 1, 1994. NAFTA has been complemented by two other regulations: the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (NAAEC) and the North American Agreement on Laboratory Cooperation (NAALC). These agreements should prevent companies from moving to other countries to take advantage of lower wages, more flexible health and safety rules for workers and more flexible environmental rules. Article 102 of NAFTA defines its purpose. There have been and there are seven concrete objectives. In 2009, the United States recorded a trade surplus of $28.3 billion with NAFTA countries for services and a trade deficit of $94.6 billion (annual increase of 36.4%) for goods in 2010. .